This comprehensive dashboard provides a complete overview of the Green Building Energy Efficiency prediction system.
The model achieves exceptional performance with 99.98% R² score, trained on 768 real-world building samples with 21 features
covering IoT sensors, building design, climate data, and operational metrics.
Key Performance Metrics
99.98%
Variance Explained (R²)
0.0030
Root Mean Squared Error
0.0018
Mean Absolute Error
0.51%
Mean Absolute Percentage Error
Dataset Exploration
Comprehensive analysis of the energy efficiency dataset including distribution analysis, feature relationships,
and correlation patterns across all feature categories.
Energy Efficiency Distribution
Complete analysis of the energy efficiency target variable including histogram, box plot, scatter plot,
and statistical summary. Shows distribution shape, outliers, and relationship with energy consumption.
Feature Categories Analysis
Analysis of how different feature categories relate to energy efficiency. Includes IoT sensors
(temperature, humidity, air quality) and building design parameters (orientation, insulation, roof type).
Complete correlation matrix showing relationships between all features and the target variable.
Red indicates negative correlation, blue indicates positive correlation. Values show correlation strength.
Model Performance Analysis
Detailed evaluation of the XGBoost model performance including prediction accuracy, residual analysis,
and error distributions. The model demonstrates exceptional performance with near-perfect predictions.
Predictions vs Actual Values
Scatter plot comparing predicted vs actual energy efficiency values. The red dashed line represents
perfect predictions. R² = 0.9998 indicates excellent model performance with predictions very close to actual values.
Residual Analysis
Residual plot showing prediction errors (actual - predicted). Well-distributed residuals around zero
indicate good model fit with no systematic bias. Low error variance demonstrates model reliability.
Comprehensive model performance analysis including predictions vs actual, residuals plot, residual distribution,
and absolute error distribution. All metrics indicate excellent model performance.
Feature Importance
XGBoost feature importance showing which features most influence energy efficiency predictions.
Higher values indicate greater impact on model predictions.
Detailed Feature Importance Analysis
Comprehensive feature importance analysis with top 20 features and cumulative importance plot.
Shows how many features are needed for optimal performance and identifies most critical factors.
Model Interpretability
Advanced interpretability analysis using SHAP and LIME methods to understand model decisions and feature contributions.
These methods provide both global and local explanations for model predictions.
SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) summary plot showing global feature importance and impact on predictions.
Red dots indicate higher feature values, blue dots indicate lower values. The plot shows how each feature
contributes to energy efficiency predictions across all samples.
SHAP Feature Importance
SHAP-based feature importance ranking. This provides a more accurate measure of feature importance
compared to traditional methods by considering feature interactions and non-linear relationships.
LIME Explanation
LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) showing feature contributions for a specific prediction.
Helps understand individual prediction decisions by showing which features increased or decreased
the predicted energy efficiency for a particular building.
Insights and Recommendations
Key insights derived from the analysis and strategic recommendations for improving building energy efficiency.
Based on comprehensive data analysis and model interpretation.
Detailed analysis showing energy efficiency by material type, orientation, temperature range, and insulation level,
along with strategic recommendations for improving building energy performance.
Key Insights
Model achieves 99.98% R² score with RMSE of 0.0030 - excellent predictive accuracy
Building material type significantly impacts energy efficiency (concrete/composite perform best)
Building orientation has measurable impact on energy efficiency
Insulation level shows strong positive correlation with efficiency
Temperature management is crucial for optimal energy efficiency
IoT sensor data (temperature, humidity, air quality) provides valuable predictive signals
Operational factors (metro logistics, policy compliance) influence efficiency
Feature importance analysis reveals building design parameters are most critical
Climate factors (solar radiation, wind speed) can be leveraged for efficiency gains
Consumer perception and environmental awareness correlate with building efficiency
Strategic Recommendations
Building Material Selection: Use concrete or composite materials for better energy efficiency. Avoid wood-based materials for high-efficiency requirements. Material choice can impact efficiency by up to 15-20%.
Orientation Optimization: Consider solar path and wind patterns when designing building orientation. Optimal orientation can significantly improve efficiency by 10-15%. Analyze local climate patterns for best results.
Insulation Improvements: Higher insulation levels directly correlate with better energy efficiency. Invest in quality insulation materials and proper installation. Top quartile insulation shows 25-30% better efficiency than bottom quartile.
Temperature Management: Maintain optimal temperature ranges for maximum efficiency. Implement smart HVAC systems with IoT sensors for real-time monitoring and automated adjustments.
Operational Efficiency: Improve metro logistics and policy compliance. Regular maintenance of equipment (monitor equipment status) is essential. Operational efficiency can contribute 5-10% to overall building efficiency.
Climate Considerations: Leverage solar radiation through proper glazing and building design. Consider wind patterns for natural ventilation opportunities. Passive design strategies can reduce energy consumption by 20-30%.
Consumer Engagement: Higher green perception and environmental awareness correlate with efficiency. Educational programs can improve perceived risk and awareness, leading to better building operation and maintenance practices.